Monday, July 1, 2013

Greenpeace drops anchor in India, serves notice to industry



 What happens when a given vessel – cruise ship, container ship, oil tanker, or anything – isn’t worth refitting? If you’re the former soviet navy, you dump it an empty bay to rust away. Private enterprise is usually a bit more motivated to recoup salvage dollars, however – giant ships are after all giant repositories of recyclable metals that are worth something if they can be recovered cheaply enough.


And that’s where a process called “shipbreaking” begins. Ships are pushed up onto third-world beaches where armies of subsistence-wage laborers cut them apart in generally dangerous fashion. The beaches are wastelands of pollution – oil, chemicals, and rust – and the work is as dangerous as you’d think it would be – blowtorches, jagged metal, 100ft drops, and fuel tanks full of explosive vapors conspire to kill or injure many shipbreakers every year. Here’s a quote that highlights the issues around one example, the French warship Clemenceau, decommissioned in the seventies, and pictured above:
 
    …environmental activists of Greenpeace and other organizations managed to break the tight security and board the ship to shout slogans against it being sent to India, where impoverished workers would break down the toxic ship, with its 500+ tonnes of asbestos. 

 Greenpeace, the international environmental campaign group, is seeing red over the ''harm being caused to the environment by polluting industries in India''.

(…)

In Alang, at the ship-breaking yard, the Greenpeace campaigners tied themselves to the anchor chains of the vessels that had come in to berth. (See the photograph alongside. Click on it for a bigger image.) These "dirty" vessels have not been decontaminated, and contain dangerous substances like asbestos and heavy-metal-based paints. "We don't want to harm 40,000 jobs, but we also want a clean industry," said Jayaraman.


Jayaraman said that Greenpeace was fully aware of the strong conflict between the lobbies representing 'clean environment' and 'jobs'. "But we are prepared for this. In the long run, a 'dirty' industry would cost us dearly: both, the jobs and the environment will be lost," he said.


Greenpeace is concerned over what it sees as the havoc-potential of poly-vinyl chlorides, or PVCs, which are considered among the most-hazardous chemicals in circulation.
 
The environmental group recently backed citizens in Goa protesting against the setting up of a copper waste recycling plant in their village, Sancoale, pointing to the risks posed by PVCs in production, use and disposal.


Villagers were literally up in arms, when Greenpeace stepped in to support them in an agitation against Meta Strips. One policeman died after being attacked by infuriated villagers, while three villagers were shot-at by the cops.


"Chemicals from the chlorine class are very persistent. They don't disappear over time. They're toxic, poisonous in a variety of ways. They can play havoc for a very long time after their release," said Jayaraman. (...)